Sidebar on how rules on NCAA athlete pay has changed But players like Jenkins had long been denied their share of the spoils, due to the NCAA’s ban against paying student athletes. Comprised of three divisions, the organization regulates more than 1,000 institutions nationwide and has swelled into a multibillion dollar outfit, as media companies have paid ever-increasing sums for the broadcast rights to marquee competitions like the College Football Playoff and the NCAA basketball tournament (better known as March Madness). “It was just insane to me that it could be a rule for so long.”įor more than a century, the NCAA has served as the chief governing body of college sports in the United States. “That was one of the major inspirations for me to effect change,” Jenkins said. “I was like, ‘Wow, they’re selling something that I helped bring to the forefront.” Looking to get a piece of the action, Jenkins tried to sell his own line of shirts, but was quickly stymied by Clemson’s compliance officers, who told him that the sales would be a violation of NCAA rules, which prohibit college athletes from earning money from their playing careers. One person pointed me to a local t-shirt vendor,” Jenkins recalled. “I saw people with ‘We too deep’ shirts on and I asked them, ‘Hey, where’d you get that from?’ One person pointed me to a website. After he saw other vendors profit from the brand, he tried to sell his own line of shirt but was told it would be a violation of NCAA rules. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.Jenkins We Too Deep as an anthem for the 2014 Clemson football team. There are so many questions that come out of that.Ĭody McDavis is a former Division I college basketball player for the University of Northern Colorado. Meaning, they are going to have to provide some kind of financial incentive, similar to what Ohio State does-although they'll never be able to do it. And to do that, they have to recruit athletes-meaning that they have to find some way to incentivize the three-star athletes who could be five-star athletes to come to them (instead of going to be a fifth guy off the bench at Ohio State). If you want to remain an athletic director, if you want to remain a coach, it's all about pushing the envelope, right? Bowling Green doesn't want to stay Bowling Green forever. I would push back on that and say, well, the keeping up with the Joneses mentality is a very real thing in college athletics. If there's an option that they can do it, then there is some nuance. This is where Sean talks about, whether there should be an option to opt in to paying athletes. It's all speculative, but over the 300-plus schools in Division 1, there's no chance that all of them could do it. So would they be able to pay athletes over a sustained period of time? I don't know. That would be pushing it, again, because you're talking about at least 300 student athletes per program.Īnd we've seen, over the pandemic, where schools in the Power Five, like Stanford, cut a lot of sports because they were restricted in their income. This is speculative-I haven't done this-but probably between $20,000 and $50,000 a student athlete annually. I'd imagine most schools in the Power Five conferences could pay. The NCAA logo is seen on the basket stanchion before the game between the Oral Roberts Golden Eagles and the Florida Gators in the second round game of the 2021 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament at Indiana Farmers Coliseum on Main Indianapolis, Indiana. Is that what we're doing? So we can get a bunch of get-rich-quick schemes? Is that what's going on, or is this truly about the betterment of student athletes? And we'll get into this more. So what are we doing here? Are we benefiting capitalism in college athletics? I think that it's great that student athletes are going to be paid-but by and large, it was the student athletes who were already going to be paid. We have to see how that's going to play out, but there's a real concern here that we are increasing the chasm that exists between men's football and men's basketball and everybody else.Īnd that's a real concern. If it does change, it changes to their detriment. Division 1 college athletics generally doesn't change. This is something that's going to largely benefit student athletes who were going to be paid anyway-the top 1 percent-and where you have student athletes that are not in those-what we refer to as revenue-generating sports, men's basketball and football-by and large, they're left out of this. I also think there are a lot of concerns that we haven't taken into account. My view on this is, I think it's great that student athletes have an opportunity to be compensated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |